Recent Posts and Categories

Clinton's "perjury trap" - Judge Andrew Napolitano

OWON: Well is Justice for Everyone or not? Is anyone more deserving than the Clintons?

Clinton's "perjury trap"

Response Action Network
31 March 2016

The FBI is about to begin interviewing the relevant parties regarding its investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails, and at the top of the list of people the feds want to speak with is Mrs. Clinton, herself. As Judge Andrew Napolitano writes, this could get very, very interesting...because it may find Clinton walking into a perjury trap of her own making:

If she were to talk to federal prosecutors and FBI agents, they would catch her in many inconsistencies, as she has spoken with great deception in public about this case. She has, for example, stated many times that she used the private server so she could have one mobile device for all of her emails. The FBI knows she had four mobile devices. She has also falsely claimed publicly and under oath that she neither sent nor received anything "marked classified." The FBI knows that nothing is marked classified, and its agents also know that her unprotected secret server transmitted some of the nation's gravest secrets.

The prosecutors and agents cannot be happy about her public lies and her repeated demeaning attitude about their investigation, and they would have an understandable animus toward her if she were to meet with them.

If she were to decline to be interviewed -- a prudent legal but treacherous political decision -- the feds would leak her rejection of their invitation, and political turmoil would break loose because one of her most imprudent and often repeated public statements in this case has been that she can't wait to talk to the FBI. That's a lie, and the FBI knows it.

Some Democrats who now understand the gravity of the case against Clinton have taken to arguing lately that the feds should establish a different and higher bar -- a novel and unknown requirement for a greater quantum of evidence and proof of a heavier degree of harm -- before Clinton can be prosecuted. They have suggested this merely because she is the likely Democratic presidential nominee.

And it's also classic Clinton. When the game gets rough, and it looks like they may's time to change the rules.


No comments :

Post a Comment

If your comment violates OWON's Terms of Service or has in the past, then it will NOT be published.

Powered by Blogger.