Recent Posts

Prince Andrew sex claims denied for second time by Palace spokesman

OWoN: This is a serious development for this publicly funded Fat Cat Prince. Pressure has now become so significant that Buckingham Place has been forced to recall his fat butt home. He has now (almost Clinton style) fully denied the charges. Remember Clinton?

The key issue, of course, is why associate with low trawling, importuning garbage like Epstein, and also which Prime Minister is referred to? Will Epstein clarify Tony Blair's role? If Randy Andy is innocent, but Blair is shown to be compromised "again", the Media can have a field day. Phoney Tony needs to be exposed. On balance of judgement these denials are so unequivocal by the Prince, it's probably a false claim. But, if proven to be true, there is no down side for him with a lifebelt or boat. His fall would be cataclysmic. 

Be sure of one thing, the British media will run with this like Bulldogs on his ass until they rip the truth out of it. If he's found to have lied, unlike Clinton, retribution will be enormous.

Now, what is Blair's alleged role with Epstein?

Prince Andrew is reported to be returning to Britain on Sunday from a holiday

Prince Andrew sex claims denied for second time by Palace spokesman

Spokesman denies Duke of York had ‘any form of sexual contact’ with woman involved in Jeffrey Epstein lawsuit

The Guardian
By Press Association
4 January 2014

Buckingham Palace has issued a second denial that the Duke of York had sexual contact with a woman who claims she was forced to have underage sex with him, branding the allegations “false and without any foundation”.

It comes after two Sunday newspapers published details of interviews with the woman who reportedly named Andrew in US court documents related to a convicted paedophile.

The palace initially stated that “any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors” by the duke was “categorically untrue”.

In a second strongly worded statement on Saturday night, a Buckingham Palace spokesman said:

“It is emphatically denied that the Duke of York had any form of sexual contact or relationship with [the woman]. The allegations made are false and without any foundation.”

The woman’s claim is part of a lawsuit in connection with the American billionaire and convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein – a former friend of the duke.

Andrew was photographed with Epstein in New York two years after the American’s release from prison in 2009, and their friendship was a source of controversy.

The woman claims that between 1999 and 2002 she “was forced to have sexual relations with this prince when she was a minor” in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein.

The accusation is reportedly contained in a motion filed in a Florida court this week which is part of a lawsuit over how federal prosecutors handled the case of Epstein, who was jailed for 18 months in 2008 for soliciting a minor for prostitution.

The Mail on Sunday and the Sunday Mirror have since published details of interviews given by the woman in recent years, in which she discusses three alleged encounters with the duke.

Meanwhile, the Sunday Express reported that Andrew was due to fly back into Britain on Sunday to face the controversy following a skiing holiday in Switzerland.

A royal source confirmed the duke had been away on a private holiday abroad.

In the US court papers, Epstein is accused of repeatedly abusing the woman – now said to be in her 30s – on his private jet and luxury homes in New York, New Mexico, Florida and the US Virgin Islands.

The court document says: “Epstein also sexually trafficked the then minor Jane Doe [a name used in US legal proceedings for people with anonymity], making her available for sex to politically connected and financially powerful people.

“Epstein’s purposes in ‘lending’ Jane Doe (along with other young girls) to such powerful people were to ingratiate himself with them for business, personal, political, and financial gain, as well as to obtain potential blackmail information.”

It adds: “For instance, one such powerful individual Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was a member of the British royal family, Prince Andrew (aka Duke of York).”

The Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz – who is also named in the court papers – said the claims against him were part of a pattern of “made-up stories” by the woman and her lawyers against prominent people.

Dershowitz, who represented Epstein in the 2008 case, said he would not rest until he had shown that the claims regarding his conduct were false and he advised the duke to do everything in his power to clear his name.

“My only feeling is, if she’s lied about me, which I know to an absolute certainty she has, she should not be believed about anyone else,” he told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.

“We know she’s lied about other public figures including a former prime minister and others who she claims to have participated in sexual activities with, so I think it must be presumed all her allegations against Prince Andrew were false as well.”

In a statement released through her lawyers to the Guardian, the woman hit back, saying: “These types of aggressive attacks on me are exactly the reason why sexual abuse victims typically remain silent and the reason why I did for a long time. That trend should change. I’m not going to be bullied back into silence.”

The duke has been dogged by accusations of a lack of judgment about his links with Epstein since 2011.

In June 2011 it was announced that he was stepping down from his role as the UK’s roving business ambassador.

Andrew gave up the post following the intense scrutiny he faced over his relationships with Epstein and other controversial figures.

Meanwhile, Ghislaine Maxwell, an associate of Epstein, has branded claims made against her as “untrue” and “obvious lies” after she was reportedly named in the US court papers by the woman.

Maxwell, the daughter of the late newspaper tycoon Robert Maxwell, has previously denied any wrongdoing and said in 2011 she would take legal action over some of the reporting of the story.

Her spokesman said: “The original allegations are not new and have been fully responded to and shown to be untrue.

“Each time the story is retold it changes, with new salacious details about public figures and world leaders.

“[The woman’s] claims are obvious lies and should be treated as such and not publicised as news, as they are defamatory.”



  1. Be assured he has been ordered back because he is under siege right now. Life for pampered, Lard arsed State funded mannequins can still get very tough. Even less with a Windsor brain which is sadly lacking in all 4 of them. William is head and shoulders above all of them. Diana did a good job. He really does not need his life under scrutiny again. The day job just got tough.

  2. Why exactly was Diana killed? I have read all the theories, but I figured you may know the truth.

    1. The Palace were furious about her Muslim boyfriend and his dodgy as hell father. Imagine if she had married him or got pregnant. The Royal connections to the next King?????? She got one out of 10 for that.

  3. This message out today fits with this subject so am putting the link here. It is a channeled message; am saying that as many are not in harmony with that kind of thing. If so, just ignore this link. In my opinion it just really fits here at this time.

    1. Thank you, Paul. I don't usually pay much attention to "channelings" but agree with what Montague Keen had to say. The truth is apparent to anyone whose eyes are open.

      Here is a video interview of Kay Griggs, confirming what many suspected:

      "Kay Griggs is the famous Christian woman (American patriot whistleblower) interview session (7.5 hours) conducted with her by Pastor Rick Strawcutter in 1998. Kay was the wife of a high-level Marine Corps colonel who revealed to her the DARK underworld of top level military and its secret elite training programs, mind control tactics, psychological warefare, drug & weapon running, and assassination squads. The unedited nearly 8 hours of material contained here is epic. Download it and keep a local hard drive copy. These interviews were conducted in 1998. Kay Griggs' recounting of how key people among us, including world leaders, are marked as rising stars and groomed for their positions is some of the most striking whistleblower testimony to have emerged, and forms the basis for a deeper understanding of global agendas in place today."


    "Virginia Roberts has told a court that, as a teen 'sex slave', she was 'trafficked for sexual purposes' to 'a well-known Prime Minister'."

    I can't wait for exposure and prosecution of the satanist child-rapists and killers. They must be soiling themselves now that the light is being shone upon princes and prime-ministers. Their day of judgement is approaching.

  5. Thank you Valdi. I listened to this sometime in the past but am going to listen again.
    I sure would like to have some really positive news, such as the pp's becoming released and the public RV's happening; as well as wanting some public arrests to happen etc. I think I am a little overloaded with awareness of the putrid stuff. In my opinion it would be very helpful if something 'big' happened to jar the minds of the vast majority out of their stupor. Hoqw do people know or realize they need to awaken if they do not realize they are asleep. How can people realize they are the creator of the dream, not the dream itself.
    I pray that the changes happen in an orderly and reasonable calm way; however, it does not seem to me at this time it will be a smooth shift. It seems to me that there may be some major disruptions happen. In any case, it will be whatever it needs to be as there is long term Spiritual cycles and patterns in play and if it destined that the race of man awaken from the nightmare they have themselves created; they will be awakened one way or the other. Sometimes, even in a free will setting we are confronted with the choice-less choice. I believe we chose and knew, prior to entering and participating in many incarnations in this epoch dream, that a moment would come where it would be brought to an end. I believe we are at that end time now.

    1. Paul,

      I feel the same. It's natural to be disheartened upon discovering the truth; frustrating that many others remain willfully unaware and gut wrenching to be powerless to do anything about it. Maintaining balance and a positive outlook are almost impossible when the odds are apparently stacked so highly against us by TPTB. But for all that, I don't regret waking up.

  6. Valdi, I am OK. Just somewhat impatient now. Am now nearly 70 and have been on the path since first OB in my teens. I first became aware of the depth of evil on the planet when i became obsessed, in early 70's with the Question: Why the Bomb and what is the ability to destroy ourselves mean to the human race?

    I would like to share something that came from within; maybe a guide, or higher self, not sure; a few years ago. It came in a meditation as single phrases which fit together nicely afterwards. I turn to this often when things get a little hairy inside; I am sure you are aware that kind of thing both personally and professionally.


  7. Watch all this unfold. She now states she met the Queen. Officially denied, but the media will not let this go. Right now Playboy Andy has the Hounds of Hell all over him. He's always been sleazy so now life is catching up. The Press want to Save the Whale and harpoon a Fat Prince!

  8. Andrew is just one of the 4 dysfunctional and Thick children the Windsor's produced.
    Diana saved them with William, but then damned Charles saddling him with the Riding Instructors child. ~She turned out a deranged Mare also. What a fiasco in Camelot. Now you get to see into their Goldfish Bowl. It's tacky.

    Only William can save the Monarchy after the Queen goes. Charles can destroy it if left to reign. He and Camilla will be a gruesome twosome. They deserve each other and need to sod off into exile. Defender of the Faith? He broke it! It needs to be a sackable offence.
    Right now, Lard Arse Thick Andy won't know what's hit him. All 4 of the kids are THICK! Thank God for William and now George. Without that we get Presidents like the dirty Kennedys, Criminal Bushes, Sleazy Clinton's and O. Jesus Christ No!!!! It's a funny world. Fancy dress and dirty knickers.

    Now, Andy apart who's just a thick fool, it's Blair we need to get the Media after.
    Just to pre advise, we have a lot of Politicians and other Public figures also about to be exposed for Child offences. Major heads will roll. It will all be exposed. As Andy is finding, even Royal privilege can not hide a sleazebag.
    There is now a whole new version of Knee Trembling in London.


If your comment violates OWON's Terms of Service or has in the past, then it will NOT be published.

Powered by Blogger.