Recent Posts and Categories

The Toxic Presidency Of Barack Obama

OWoN: How long can Klutsville last? Both he and the Commie Slumlady are major jokes worldwide.

Remarkable how one person can cause so much damage.

The Toxic Presidency Of Barack Obama

DW Ulsterman
By Ulsterman
6 November 2014

Hours after his own Democratic Party was dealt a debilitating rebuke by American voters across the nation, President Barack Obama stepped to the podium to take questions and ramble on for well over an hour all the while seemingly unrepentant for his own fault in politically dividing a nation against itself for the last six years – a division that has left Democrats scrambling to remain relevant at a time when everything Obama is seen as toxic, disruptive, and incompetent.

Yesterday it was reported here how Democratic Party leaders were willing to work with Republicans to try and convince the White House to push out longtime White House Senior Adviser and de facto President Valerie Jarrett to better ensure Barack Obama might have an opportunity to listen to reason instead of constantly clinging to the hyper-partisan socialist ideals that have long marked the Jarrett-Obama administration. Barack Obama accepted a Nobel Peace Prize based on his own 2008 campaign promises, but has never accepted any mistakes for his actual failures and broken promises as President of the United States.

And while some among the Mainstream Media are once again attempting to prop up the Obama legacy, those efforts are doing little to soothe the legitimate concerns of Democrats who see a party in disarray and a future dependent upon the equally tired legacy of Hillary Clinton who herself is attached to some of the Obama administration’s greatest scandals.

For too long the face of the Democratic Party has been the multi headed hydra of Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. These four represent a shrill and divisive far left ideology that was thoroughly refused by voters earlier this week throughout all levels of government.

After six years of their wailing incompetence, an increasing number of voters regardless of party affiliation began asking themselves, “What is wrong with these people?” They witnessed time and again Democratic leaders who lied, and then lied about those lies, one layer of deception stacked upon the other. There appeared to be no accountability, no considerate and mature stewardship of the government. It was all media created image, petulant complaints, superficial platitudes, and one failure after the next.

While Republicans were capable of being bad, this version of Democrats were clearly worse – much worse.

And then shortly after his hour-plus ramble yesterday, Valerie Jarrett shared this tweet:

Valerie JarrettVerified account‏@vj44

President Obama is optimistic and focused on using every second of the fourth quarter to make our nation stronger for the American people.

In the past, her words would have been greeted by happy support from the administration’s supporters. Yesterday, not so much…



MadAsHell! ‏@DoneDeal2014 19h19 hours ago

@vj44 umm, did u not get the message from American people? Obama’s been BENCHED!

0 replies41 retweets23 favorites



Shelby Blakely ‏@aBeneGesserit 19h19 hours ago

@vj44, whatever. Democrats don’t have anything to lose by losing you and President Puppet. Vice President Broomcloset is a better choice.

0 replies14 retweets13 favorites



Rick Thomas ‏@RickRlthomasjr 19h19 hours ago

@vj44 He’s a smug prick! Couldn’t care less how he destroys this country! You’re going down with him Val.

0 replies16 retweets12 favorites


And then this headline from U.S. News and World Report that came the same time our D.C. Whispers report on the very same subject:

Time for a Shake-Up

Obama needs to clean house, starting with Valerie Jarrett.


RELATED STORY: D.C. Whispers: Democrat and Republican Leaders Say Jarrett Must Go



  1. The IRS-Benghazi Congress

    In many ways, the results from this week’s elections confirm what you already know as a supporter of Judicial Watch. Voters are sick and tired of the Obama administration’s lawlessness. The new Congress has new mandate to clean up Washington and put the Obama administration (and, frankly, itself) back under the rule of law.

    And all the talk of policies and campaign ads is for naught if elections can be stolen. Assuming the leftists in the Obama administration cared about what voters think, they would see their war on voter ID has little support.

    Contrary to what Obama, Eric Holder and other leftist critics of voter identification requirements have said, a broad cross-section of Americans do not view the new state laws as unduly burdensome and discriminatory. In fact, a substantial majority of Americans ardently support new state laws that require voters to show some form of identification. That’s what the results of an election night survey of voters organized through The Polling Company Inc. shows. The poll, which was drawn from the responses of 806 actual 2014 voters, was released today by Judicial Watch and

    (See complete article at :

  2. GOP Needs To Be Ready For Obama’s Attorney General Fight

    Gird your loins, Beltway Republicans. Election Day is barely over, but the progressive left is locked and loaded for battle over President Obama’s next U.S. attorney general.

    Liberals unhappy with the administration’s failure to deliver a mass illegal alien amnesty fast enough want a consolation prize. The Congressional Hispanic Caucus sent Obama a demand letter last week promoting Labor Secretary Tom Perez as Eric Holder’s replacement. Mother Jones ran with “Why Picking Tom Perez for Attorney General Would Be a Smart Move for Obama.”

  3. ‘US faked Islam to incite wars’

    Press TV has conducted an interview with Randy Short, a Washington-based human rights activist, to discuss the terrorist attack in Russia’s Volgograd.

    What follows is a rough transcription of the interview.

    Press TV: Dr. Short why would these supposedly Muslim Chechen fighters want to conduct these kinds of operations, suicide bombings, the killing of innocent people?

    We had, as part of our report there, those who are saying that religion, Islam in this instance, is being used as their cover because Islam in itself or even Christianity or other religions do not allow for these kinds of terrorist attacks.

    Short: Well, let us remember, just to repeat what was stated by the announcer. Suicide is Haram (religiously forbidden) in the Shariah (religious law), it is against the teachings of the Prophet (peace be upon him), it is against the teachings of the Torah as well as the Christian bible. All Abrahamic faiths reject suicide.

    This is a creation of a multinational globalist agenda against the resource-rich people who live in the Levantine areas and other oil-rich areas that Brzezinski called the Great Chessboard or the Great Game going back to the initial British invasion of Afghanistan; and going to Afghanistan in the 1970’s where the CIA began to create this false Islam and trained these mujahedeen and President Reagan in 1985 had a national security decision directive to fund this dangerous, toxic, fake, Islam to incite wars in the region and in particular to go after pro-soviet regimes as well as to attack the former Soviet Union. So this is a continuation of the cold war that whereas the Russians have shown good faith and restraint, since 1945 they have been attacked by the United States, the NATO bloc and its proxies.

  4. US created ISIL when Syria war began: Analyst

    An American political commentator says the United States and its allies in the Middle East created the ISIL terrorist group at the beginning of the Syria war.

    “They spent quite a bit of money creating ISIS (ISIL) and its counterparts at the beginning of the Syria war,” Charles Glass, author of Tribes with Flags, told Press TV on Saturday.

    “ISIS (ISIL) wouldn’t be there, if it hadn’t been for Western and Turkish, and Saudi, and Qatari support from the beginning,” he added.

    “So all they’re now doing is spending money to counteract the effect of the money that they spent at the beginning of the war,” he continued.

    The author made the remarks after House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon called on President Barack Obama on Friday to reconsider his strategy against ISIL.

    McKeon said that Obama should clearly explain how the funding supports a new direction.

    The Obama administration has so far requested $5 billion for a counterterrorism partnership fund and $500 million for the training and equipping of the so-called “moderate” Syrian militants.

    “We don’t know how that money is going to spend,” Glass said. “There are a lot of unanswered questions and whoever says that the strategy isn’t clear is speaking the truth.”

    Since early August, the US military has been conducting airstrikes against ISIL positions in Iraq. Some Western states have also participated in some of the air raids in Iraq.

    The US and some of its Arab allies have been carrying out airstrikes against ISIL inside Syria since late September without any authorization from Damascus or a UN mandate.


If your comment violates OWON's Terms of Service or has in the past, then it will NOT be published.

Powered by Blogger.