Recent Posts and Categories

"The Wanta Plan" and the Mitterand Protocols

OWoN: An interesting twist to the Wanta story which needs reading. So where is truth?

Must be a slow gossip day. It is a story that only the principals know and everyone else is looking at the show unfolding, so who knows what truth or reality is, as in time it will become clear.


G-7 Economic Summit leaders at the Palais Schaumburg in Bonn, Federal Republic of Germany (left to right) Jacques Delors, Bettino Craxi, Francois Mitterrand, Margaret Thatcher, Helmut Kohl,President Reagan, Yasuhiro Nakasone, Brian Mulroney - 3 May 1985


"The Wanta Plan" and the Mitterand Protocols


By Anonymous
13 January 2015

To The Administrator of Abundant Hope:

Sir / Madam,

I am writing to you and other websites in respect of the subject of the Collateral Accounts and the all too many number of people who make claims about these accounts and the assets. I refer to people like Leo Wanta, Michael Cottrell, Karen Hudes, Neil Keenan, Drake, Casper, Wilcock, David Crayford, and many others.

As a retired Intelligence Officer I have quite a bit of time on my hands and have undertaken an extensive amount of research on this subject over several years, utilising the facilities of friends who are still operational in the Intelligence networks around the world.

When I started on this subject it puzzled me and confused me when it shouldn't have done. It didn't take me long to establish the reason for this puzzling and confusing situation, which was far too many conflicting stories by people making claims about the collateral accounts, or as some people refer to it as the wealth of the world. Strangely, from all my research, most of the stories carried the same basic issues but brought into question the ownership of these accounts or wealth. Also strange, was the fact that the majority of those persons making the claims were somehow and in one way or another, connected to the American Government or Officials of the American Government, the World Bank, the Central Intelligence Agency, the US Armed Forces, or Journalism. That in my opinion as a former Intelligence Officer is too many coincidences to be a coincidence. The only person that stood out as the Lone Wolf was David Crayford.

It was also very strange that these claims commenced in a very mild form in 1995 and have continued in an increasing manner right up to date with more and more people making claims against this apparent wealth in the latter years, yet when you read all the various articles and listened to numerous videos, which I have attentively undertaken, as boring and demanding as that can be, there is a definite and heavily weighted "It's America's Gold and Wealth" and a free for all distribution factor when all of this can be brought out and the public made aware of these accounts and / or wealth.

On the other side there is one person who appears to stand by logical principles and legalities based upon an organised system surrounding these accounts / wealth. There appears to be a well organised "David and Goliath" situation here, which, when we understand how organised and recorded things are, and have been for decades; should not exist at all. It is very strange that it does exist at all which leads me to state that much of what is being published in written or video form is deliberate and total misinformation designed for a specific purpose.

Let me get to the actual point of this letter to you. This is one specific point that I have intensely researched as I was active at the time and to a degree what it entailed was on the fringes of my own specialised work at that time.

Leo Wanta
Former Ambassador LEO WANTA. Having read every article and listened to videos possible, either from Leo Wanta or about Leo Wanta, especially his latest video and the writings of Michael Cottrell, I am amazed and disgusted at their dogmatic and audacious claims and proposals.

As I have previously stated, this bordered on my own specialised work at the time, so I am fully aware that both Leo Wanta and Michael Cottrell are false claimants. What I am about to state will, I hope, blow the lid off their particular box.

Leo Wanta claims that he entered into an agreement with President Ronald Reagan in respect of the money he is claiming is his and being blocked by the Banks and / or Government of the US. What Leo Wanta was involved with was fraudulent from day one, and I am sure he realised it at the time. Through intensive research I have established that Leo Wanta was responsible for the theft of assets of this wealth in conjunction with George Herbert Walker Bush, Head of the Central Intelligence Agency during Ronald Reagan's time as President. Those assets were utilised within the Federal Reserve Trading Programs, generating trillions of US Dollars in returns. This was for a specific purpose which I will identity below.

The question at the time was how to implement what was planned and use all this money for the purpose intended. A very cunning scheme was developed by the Central Intelligence Agency which was eventually referred to as the "Mitterand Protocols". However, there were still barriers to overcome, one of which was getting the world to accept the "Mitterand Protocols" which could not be achieved based upon the real purpose of these protocols.

Deliberately, cunningly, and deceitfully those persons behind all of this decided to link the "Global Settlements Agreement (Ferdinand Marcos 1980)" to the protocols which promised substantial payments to every Government that signed the "Mitterand Protocols".

Obviously, the countries of the world signed these protocols believing they were going to receive substantial funds for their country. Needless to say, no country ever received one cent of the funds attached to the "Mitterand Protocols", nor would they ever receive any funds. The world had been conned, in its highest form, and coerced into signing these Protocols when all the time Fraud by the initiators of these Protocols was the absolute and ultimate intention.

Leo Wanta was deeply involved in all of this.

Instead of paying out these generated funds to the countries who signed the Protocols and under what they claimed as the "Global Settlements Agreement", amounting to well over $600 trillion USD, the funds were used ultimately for the nefarious purpose intended which was, bringing down the "Iron Curtain" and destroying Communism in Russia and the former Eastern Bloc. Trillions of USD was pumped / paid to people and organisations within the former Eastern Bloc and Russia, to destabilise all these countries, and as we all know the "Iron Curtain" fell and Communism effectively destroyed in 1989. There was however some funds left over from this International Crusade against Communism. Those funds amounted to just over 60 trillion USD , which is the money that Leo Wanta is claiming is his and for which he has entered into agreements with the Banks holding those funds and the US Treasury to get the funds into American into his account and under his control.

I can say that at the time we were all livid with the actions initiated by America, and implemented under the Protocols. What the three Master Signatories (France .... President Mitterand, USA .... President Ronald Reagan, and the UK .... Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and not surprisingly the very same three parties of the Trilateral Trillinium Tripartite Gold Commission established in 1945) did destroyed the status quo that we in Europe were maintaining to further political dialogue.

In fact many of us stated that these three leaders (Reagan, Mitterand, and Thatcher) should have been tried for treason against their own countries and the world, because that is what it amounted to. They deceived their countries, and lied to all other countries around the world, for their own political agenda, an agenda that continues vigorously and intensely to this very day although the leaders at the time have since long gone from power.

It was not until early 2011 that the Master Holder, and yes there is a Master Holder of this wealth which I am fully aware of now, realised what had happened and immediately ordered a "Block" on all remaining accounts. At the same time all documents marked "Top Secret" or "Above Top Secret" or "Cloaked in Secrecy" related to Ronald Reagan's term of Presidency were immediately declassified to allow for a thorough investigation which I understand (and that is from official sources) still goes on today.




Here I have to agree whole heartedly with David Crayford's comments. He rightfully stated that, quote "as these funds (In excess of $600 trillion USD) were generated from stolen assets of the Collateral Accounts, the funds legally belonged to the Collateral Accounts and that what funds remained ($60+ trillion) on account have been returned to the Collateral Accounts" end quote.

Therefore, neither Leo Wanta nor Michael Cottrell has any claim to any funds that remained on account in banks across America and Europe. Again, I concur with what David Crayford has previously stated being, quote, "any agreements executed by these people, which is referenced to the remaining funds, are illegal and unenforceable in law".

Unfortunately, Russia, and even many of the former Eastern Bloc countries are still suffering from these idiotic and empire building policies of the past.

There is another "Twist in the Tail" here as well, which I was only informed, by my official sources, about in the last few months. This "Twist" makes the whole thing laughable but at the same time shows just how deceptive and criminal the initiators of this "International Crusade to bring down the Iron Curtain" have been.

It has been officially established that the liquid funds (That is money literally paid in cash) paid to people and organisations within the former Eastern Bloc and Russia were deliberately fake USD Notes printed outside of America and cannot be used as currency. Any other money on account and transferred by any bank would be electronic and therefore considered as legal currency and a liability on America.

How much is actually involved of the $600+ trillion USD originally generated, I am not aware of. The question being asked now is "Were did any original currency go and on whose accounts was it credited to". That is one reason apparently why investigations are still going on.

So Mr Wanta and Mr Cottrell your game is up. You may be able to deploy misinformation to the masses which some will believe, but you cannot deploy your lies against official records and official information.

I have no doubt in my mind the same will apply to people as Karen Hudes, Neil Keenan, as my research continues with remarkably and non-coincidentally, similar results as the above.

I have written this to bring out some of the truth to the people who have a need to have a belief in something for which they believe in what appears to be the best for them. The Official truth tells a completely different story from what you are being told by people such as Wanta and Cottrell.

Please do not quote my name as what is stated above may border on Breach of Official Secrets, although I have been very careful to avoid such matters.

link

14 comments :

  1. Many voices and views are emerging as it all heats up. Answers will emerge one way or another. As, hopefully will truth.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Although we know far more of the history, we are allowing each side to show a case. Fair play.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you John

    Appreciated ..... I expressed my deduction and observations over consequences ..... which were very severe and could had been even worse in Russia and in East Europe - Yugoslavia paid their prize because of that...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beside Want might had been operating on behalf of others and orders of others and he might not had access to all meetings that preceded the final stage of action and decision - he might not had been told all ....

      ;;;;;
      We have today just Kohl walking around and then other cabal who probably were real initiators of it .....

      ;;;;;
      In my view it would be miracle of Putin does not consider Wanta and his action and gains as an enemy act of Russia with priority number two after the current regime of DC.

      ;;;;;
      Regarding truth coming out eventually, sometimes? I am not fond of this that much. With truth justice should come..... what kind of help truth about MH 17 will be to those who did not need to die? If truth was publicly revealed about who did it openly -we had Ukraine today probably fixed.

      ;;;;;;;;
      Who cares about truth coming out in generations - how do you want to serve justice then?

      Delete
  4. John

    Just be careful out there - you got too close to Wanta and it is not so clear what and who he represents - watch out your back - Please Sir.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am not too close. I was asked many years ago to maintain a discrete role only. As such I only allow communication via a friendly third party mutual associate. Diplomacy is key.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This was on Rumormill. Have to wonder if divide and conquer isn't being used with this situation to get white hat principles arguing amongst themselves. Things aren't always what they seem to be.

    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?noframes;read=8364

    E-mail from AL HODGES: "Anonymous and the Wanta Plan"
    Posted By: hobie
    Date: Wednesday, 14-Jan-2015 04:49:27

    In Response To: "The Wanta Plan" and the Mitterand Protocols. (igots2no)
    Hi, Folks -
    Received via e-mail from Al Hodges:
    =====
    Anonymous and the Wanta Plan
    The following was posted on Jan 12, 2015 - 9:09:04 PM by "Anonymous." I have brought it to your attention only because it will give you some insight into what has actually transpired in the past years/decades. As most of you know, Michael C. Cottrell is currently a client of mine; I know him personally and , while I can and do attest to his honesty and exemplary character, that is not the point of this post. Mr. Cottrell is currently assembling the documents which clearly establish the true facts, which will be posted in due course. In the interim, please read the following with these actual facts in mind: 1.) Mr. Cottrell has never attempted to take on any of the moneys referred to; 2.) Mr. Cottrell has no interest in any of the moneys referred to; 3.) Mr. Cottrell has an expectation that he will be repaid from the WGS for the theft of his companies in the early '90s; and 4.) Mr. Cottrell expects to receive access to a very large sum of $$, as a loan from the Chinese families to be repaid, which sum will be utilized to perform the U.S. Dollar Refunding Project, which I have previously referenced.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thatcher was a member of Le Cercle aligned to the Vatican. The following article has more information on Le Cercle and other secret societies, Thatcher, Reagan, Mitterand, communism and provides some interesting names that show up in global strategic planning:

    www.isgp.nl/Le_Cercle

    From the article: ¨To get right to the point, Le Cercle is a secretive, privately-funded and transnational discussion group which regularly meets in different parts of the world. It is attended by a mixture of politicians, ambassadors, bankers, shady businessmen, oil experts, editors, publishers, military officers and intelligence agents, who may or may not have retired from their official functions. The participants come from western or western-oriented countries. Many important members tend to be affiliated with the aristocratic circles in London or obscure elements within the Vatican, and accusations of links to fascism and Synarchism are anything but uncommon in this milieu. The greatest enemy of the Cercle has been the Soviet Union and members have been crusading against communist subversion for many decades. During this process, Cercle members unfortunately have accused almost every nationalist and socialist government, every labour union, every terrorist, and every serious investigator of western intelligence of being in bed with the KGB.¨

    It is a long article....on the side of it, it is actually stated that Bush ran the White House and NOT Reagan...even though he appeared to run it:

    "Reagan never really was the president. He was the front man. They selected a guy that had charisma, who was popular, and just a good old boy, but they got George Bush in there to actually run the White House. They’d let Ronald Reagan and Nancy out of the closet and let them make a speech and run them up the flagpole and salute them and put them back in the closet while these spooks ran the White House. They made sure that George Bush was the chairman of each of the critical committees involving these covert operations things.¨ - Gene Wheaton (2002)

    From the article: ¨But even though Mitterrand was a socialist, he also was an ardent Catholic who favored European integration. Also, Georges Albertini already anticipated the victory of the socialists and brought Mitterrand's closest friend and confidant, Francois de Grossouvre, into the Cercle six months before the elections.¨

    Another quote from the article:"In my opinion, Opus Dei is a government onto itself. ... I am [also] of the opinion that Opus Dei should rule over all of Europe, and people who share my view of hierarchy and discipline should join Opus Dei. I am convinced that this is the only thing that can save Europe. Opus Dei will follow President Reagan." - Prince Miguel de Bourbon-Parma (13th of November, 1984)

    So what would Mitterand, Thatcher and Reagan have been up to? It seems far more plausible with this background that the Mitterand Protocols would have been used to attack the Communist world and NOT help the world in general and that actually lends credence to this alternative version.

    How could Reagan possibly get into the White House and have a superior control to that of the Bush family? The Bush family would have been well entrenched after that many years.....

    ReplyDelete
  8. Then they put the money/debt on the backs of the American people...this is the bottom line...I can imagine that most of this cash was stolen and secreted away in accounts that had no accountability to any country (vatican bank). And the proceeds are obscured because they created fake bonds and distributed them to countries within their trading blocks around the world to amass the wealth of the world. They not only broke the back of communism, they broke the bank of every country around the world through the deceptive fake bonds.

    I do believe that they had to bail out the foreign banks because of the fake bonds...like a shell game, they showed the bonds and traded for cash, hoarded the cash and then the American public was hit twice to pay back the debts created by them...they shanghi'd the world...

    They're piggy banks are busting loose in shelters across the country outside of UsA banking authorities; within businesses that they own off shore. According to the chart that was created by the Zurich Team:

    "The Zurich team can. From Orbis 2007, a database listing 37 million companies and investors worldwide, they pulled out all 43,060 TNCs and the share ownerships linking them. Then they constructed a model of which companies controlled others through shareholding networks, coupled with each company's operating revenues, to map the structure of economic power.

    The work, to be published in PLoS One, revealed a core of 1318 companies with interlocking ownerships (see image). Each of the 1318 had ties to two or more other companies, and on average they were connected to 20. What's more, although they represented 20 per cent of global operating revenues, the 1318 appeared to collectively own through their shares the majority of the world's large blue chip and manufacturing firms - the "real" economy - representing a further 60 per cent of global revenues.

    When the team further untangled the web of ownership, it found much of it tracked back to a "super-entity" of 147 even more tightly knit companies - all of their ownership was held by other members of the super-entity - that controlled 40 per cent of the total wealth in the network. "In effect, less than 1 per cent of the companies were able to control 40 per cent of the entire network," says Glattfelder. Most were financial institutions. The top 20 included Barclays Bank, JPMorgan Chase & Co, and The Goldman Sachs Group."

    Follow the money...http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228354.500-revealed--the-capitalist-network-that-runs-the-world.html#.UyeWDIV1Cls

    ReplyDelete
  9. Do not take anything of the following too seriously...Heneghan is a professional disinformation agent who purposefully only deals in one directional information, but the message he put out is interesting in a way by reading in between the lines:

    shininglight2012.blogspot.nl/2012/10/tom-heneghan-direct-message.html

    I think we can deduce from this that the Collateral Accounts aka the the Mitterand Protocols are in fact the World Global Settlements and it makes sense in what the Mitterand Protocols were meant to do, but never did.

    The scam being reversed and replaced with an actual execution of the original plan would therefore also imply an appropriate name that does not refer to the scam.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Edit: I am not sure if the above is correct as Hodges did indicate that Cottrell makes no claim to the Wanta monies, but does hope to compensated from the WGS....so it might be subject to interpretation.

      Delete
    2. What I stated has to be rephrased for a more accurate view of a provided perspective which is as follows: It seems that Ferdinand Marcos was the original Holder/Custodian of the Global Settlements Agreement to which the Mitterrand Protocols were attached in order to wage war on Communist countries. When Ferdinand Marcos died, Queen Elizabeth of the United Kingdom became the Holder/Custodian of this. Wanta considers the Mitterrand Protocols component his from this perspective, whilst another camp considers this component illegal and thus to be redirected to the Global Settlements Agreement component aka the World Global Settlements of present day.

      This also explains why Queen Elizabeth is so involved in this and especially why Queen Elizabeth of the United Kingdom is THAT important as Holder/Custodian over this vast pool of money....it is then only logical that she would be the Head of the Committee of 300. It does not mean she owns these funds...she takes care of them for other parties, but control is everything.

      Delete
    3. Saturnalia S,

      So, the obvious question is controls them for who exactly?

      ....thnx for ALL you do here!!

      ~darylluke.

      Delete
  10. FEDUP,

    I am beyond words reading what you posted....I think it would be safe to say that the CEO's of 1318 companies are each and all Zionists and Satanists by default. So, we would know the names of the ENEMIES OF HUMANITY. Yet, what does one do with such a list, and more importantly WHO exactly is their puppet-master?

    REALITY, she is a bitch! My heart breaks for the future of humanity.

    ~darylluke.

    ReplyDelete

If your comment violates OWON's Terms of Service or has in the past, then it will NOT be published.

Powered by Blogger.