Recent Posts and Categories

NATO vs BRICS et al | what all the barking is about

OWoN: Putting it all into perspective, Pepe goes to the heart of what the noise is about.

"The real deal this September is not NATO. It’s the SCO’s summit. Expect the proverbial tectonic shifts of geopolitical plaques in the upcoming meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization – a shift as far-reaching as when the Ottoman empire failed at the gates of Vienna in 1683. On the initiative of Russia and China, at the SCO summit. India, Pakistan, Iran and Mongolia will be invited to become permanent members. Once again, the battle lines are drawn. NATO vs SCO. NATO vs BRICS. NATO vs Global South. Therefore, NATO attacks!"

The War dog in Self Survival. Who now dies for them?

In truth the fight is about the USD as the reserve currency and the resulting isolation of North America.




NATO Attacks!


Global Research
By Pepe Escobar
(Asia Times)
7 September 2014

First thing we do, let’s kill all the myths. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is nothing but the Security Council of the Empire of Chaos.

You don’t need to be a neo-Foucault hooked on Orwellian/Panopticon practices to admire the hyper-democratic“ring of steel” crossing average roads, parks and even ringing castle walls to “protect” dozens of NATO heads of state and ministers, 10,000 supporting characters and 2,000 journalists from the real world in Newport, Wales – and beyond.

NATO’s summit in Wales also provides outgoing secretary-general Anders “Fogh of War” Rasmussen the chance to display his full attack dog repertoire. It’s as if he’s auditioning for a starring role in a remake of Tim Burton’s epic Mars Attacks!

Fogh of War is all over the place, talking “pre-positioning of supplies, equipment” – euphemism for weapons; boosting bases and headquarters in host countries; and touting a 10,000-strong, rapid reaction “spearhead” force to respond to Russian “aggression” and deployable in a maximum of five days.

Meanwhile, in a bad cop-bad cop routine, outgoing president of the European Commission, outstanding mediocrity Jose Manuel Barroso, leaked that Russian President Vladimir Putin told him over the phone later last week he could take Kiev in a fortnight if he wanted.

Well, Putin could. If he wanted. But he doesn’t want it. What matters is what he told Rossiya state TV; that Kiev should promote inclusive talks about the future statute of Eastern Ukraine. Once again, the Western spin was that he was advocating the birth of a Novorossiya state. Here, The Saker analyzes in detail the implications of what Russia really wants, and what the Novorossiya forces really want.

With Lithuanian president Dalia Grybauskaite predictably spinning that Russia is “at war with Europe”, and British Prime Minister David Cameron evoking – what else – Munich 1938 (Chamberlain appeasing Hitler), Fogh of War has had all the ammo he needs to sell his Einsatzgruppen. Cynics are excused to believe NATO’s spearhead force is actually The Caliph’s IS goons raising hell in “Syraq”.

Warmongering, though, is not an easy sell in a crisis-hit EU these days. Not only Germany, but also France, Italy, Spain, Romania, Hungary and even Poland have expressed “reluctance” one way or another to back NATO’s strategy of a more “robust” presence in Eastern Europe and the Baltic. Moreover, the Empire of Chaos and its Brit junior partner in the “special relationship” want everyone to shell out more cash (a minimum of 2% of GDP). Even as the EU is facing no less than its third recession in five years.

The bottom line is there will be no more rotation on NATO’s Eastern front. Legally, the set up cannot be defined as “permanent”, because it will go against a 1997 NATO-Russia pact. But it will be permanent. That applies to Szczecin, in Poland, near the Baltic, and the so-called multinational Corps Northeast – land, air and sea. Estonia and Latvia for all practical purposes are being touted as “Putin’s next targets”. And defending them from “Russian aggression” is NATO’s new red line.

Additionally, Finland and Sweden may sign NATO Host Nation agreements. This implies NATO forces may use Swedish and Finnish territory in the future on the way to what’s hazily referred to as “operations”. At least deployment of foreign troops still needs parliamentary approval – and Swedes and Finns are bound to raise eyebrows.


No R2P for you, buddy

Even with all this Mars Attacks! hysteria, NATO in thesis won’t discuss Ukraine in depth in Wales – or an imminent R2P (“responsibility to protect”) Ukraine from the remixed “Evil Empire” (copyright Ronnie Reagan). But there will be “military consultations” and a bit of cash shelled out to the Kiev military – who are having their (bankrupt) collective behind solemnly kicked by the federalist/separatist forces in Eastern Ukraine as much as NATO had theirs kicked by a bunch of Pashtuns with Kalashnikovs in Afghanistan.

By the way, the latest US$1.4 billion the International Monetary Fund shelled out to Ukraine – the Mobster-style interest will hit much later – will be used by an already bankrupt Kiev mostly to pay for a bunch of T-72 tanks it bought from Hungary. Money for nothing, tanks for free.

Ukraine, it must be stressed, is not a NATO member. Technically, every NATO bureaucrat in Brussels admits that a candidate country must request membership. And countries with regions mired in an international dispute are not accepted. So Ukraine would only be considered if Kiev gave up Crimea. It’s not going to happen.

Still, Washington’s obsessive play to annex Ukraine to NATO will keep marching on (in the matter of accession, by the way, the European Union would issue a firm “no”). Outgoing Prime Minister Arseniy “Yats” Yatsenyuk as well as President Poroshenko, are desperate for a NATO intervention, or at least Ukraine being accepted as some form of privileged ally. Yats expects “monumental decisions from our Western partners at the summit”. In vain.

NATO somehow is already in Ukraine. A NATO cyber center group has been in Kiev since March, operating in the building of the Council of National Security and Defense. So it is a bunch of NATO bureaucrats who actually determine the news agenda in Ukraine – and the non-stop demonization of all things Russia.

Ukraine is all about Germany now. Berlin wants a political solution. Fast. Berlin wants Russian gas flowing via Ukraine again. Fast. Berlin does not want US missile defense in Eastern Europe – no matter what the Baltic states scream. That’s why Poroshenko’s latest “Invasion! Invasion! Invasion!” craze is nothing but pure desperation by a lowly, bankrupt vassal of the Empire of Chaos. Of course that does not prevent Fogh of War – who got the NATO job because he was an enthusiastic cheerleader of the rape of Iraq – to keep crying “Invasion!” till all Danish retrievers come home.


Real deal

And then there’s NATO’s recent record. An ignominious defeat in Afghanistan. A “humanitarian” bombing that reduced once-stable Libya to a miserable failed state immersed in total anarchy and ravaged by rabid militias. Not exactly fabulous PR for NATO’s future as a coalition assembly line with global “vocation”, capable of pulling off expeditionary wars all around the world by creating the appearance of a military and political consensus unified by – what else – an Empire of Chaos doctrine: NATO’s “strategic concept” approved at the 2010 Lisbon summit. (See US a kid in a NATO candy store, Asia Times Online, November 25, 2010.)

Since those go-go “Bubba” Clinton years; through the “pre-emptive” Dubya era; and now under the R2P dementia of Obama’s warring Medusas (Rice, Power, Hillary), the Pentagon dreams of NATO as global Robocop, dominating all the roles embodied by the UN and the EU in terms of security. This has absolutely nothing to do with the original collective defense of NATO signatories against possible territorial attacks. Oh, sorry; we forgot the attacks by those (non-existent) nuclear missiles deployed by evil Iran.

The Ukraine battleground at least has the merit of showing the alliance is naked. For the Full Spectrum Dominance Pentagon, what really matters above all is something that’s been actually happening since the fall of the Soviet Union; unlimited NATO expansion to the westernmost borders of Russia.

The real deal this September is not NATO. It’s the SCO’s summit. Expect the proverbial tectonic shifts of geopolitical plaques in the upcoming meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization – a shift as far-reaching as when the Ottoman empire failed at the gates of Vienna in 1683. On the initiative of Russia and China, at the SCO summit, India, Pakistan, Iran and Mongolia will be invited to become permanent members. Once again, the battle lines are drawn. NATO vs SCO. NATO vs BRICS. NATO vs Global South. Therefore, NATO attacks!


Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007), Red Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the surge (Nimble Books, 2007), and Obama does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009). He may be reached at pepeasia@yahoo.com.

link

3 comments :

  1. BRICS...power move...shift of power; creating a vacuum of cooperation of a global economic bloc. So long NAFTA, GAFTA, Trans Pacific Partnership, Kyoto Protocols...anything that funnels power down to one with central banks at the top.turning off the spigot of tyranny..
    It appears no one wants to go down with the "SHIP/Admirality Laws."
    Could this be isolationism, where if criminals are left without any strings attached they can be easily apprehended?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rothschild’s U.S. NWO Czars Panic Over Crimea: All About Fear of Losing Global NWO Totalitarian Dominance!
    The Real Fear Is In The NWO’s Fear Of Themselves Facing Justice By The World’s Citizens.

    http://politicalvelcraft.org/2014/05/05/rothschilds-u-s-nwo-czars-panic-over-crimea-all-about-fear-of-losing-global-nwo-totalitarian-dominance/

    The current Ukraine crisis is serious and threatening, so much so that some commentators even compare it to the Cuban missile crisis of 1962.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Since its founding NATO has always been
    An Attack Dog for War
    The unrecognized beneficiary
    Of this continuing crime has always been Israel.
    http://rense.com/general96/natocontext.html


    The global plan under which NATO was created 65 years ago, in 1949, was meant to give the West an aggressive force to keep Russia contained during the Cold War. When the Berlin Wall went down the Warsaw Pact, which was the Eastern Force that was created to counter NATO was dissolved.

    NATO however went in search of new clients to fund them as a quasi-mercenary force that could follow up on the financial crimes of the IMF and the global-banks, in order to protect the criminal seizure of any nation which proved hostile to the current push; to crush all opposition to the old-world-order, masquerading as the new-world-order.

    The missing players that made use of NATO were contained in PNAC, the Project for the New American Century. That tacit group, the creatures that gave voice to needing “a New Pearl Harbor” prior to 911 had lived in the sewers beneath the Tarnished House from Gerald Ford’s days: Until Bush Jr. brought them out of the primordial ooze, to run this war upon the world that began with Israel’s attack on the United States on 911.

    Kissinger and Brzezinski along with others had used PNAC and NATO to cover what these traitors sought to force upon an unsuspecting world, at least as far back as the Amerikan overthrow of Chile in 1973.

    That template is the same one that has been in use since 9-11-1973, when the US stole Chile for same powers that control the FED and the United States for Israel today.

    Since the Cold War ended NATO’s only job has been to find ways to stay alive to keep creating global-confrontations, whenever the traitors that serve Israel, need to break any nation that refuses to unconditionally surrender to Western Global Conquest.

    The “conference” that was just held inside the Ring of Steel in Cardiff, was not just symbolic: That conference was clearly held to create another global-confrontation to perpetuate and expand the global war in Europe. NATO’s job, in context, is to permanently destabilize the entire planet. Their secondary job is to take the heat off the traitors throughout the US that created everything to do with Ukraine and Russia since November of last year when Ukraine’s government was overthrown by USI and the Nazis. Cheney, Rumsfeld, Bush, Rice and all the suddenly silent Zionists like Feinstein, Pelosi, Boxer, Biden and his opportunistic son, along with that walking corpse that calls himself Kerry but whose name is actually ‘Cohen’ ­ were on the record for creating the end of Ukraine.

    ReplyDelete

If your comment violates OWON's Terms of Service or has in the past, then it will NOT be published.

Powered by Blogger.