Recent Posts and Categories

Bush Administration Lawsuit Hearing Scheduled for September 11th, 2014

OWoN: More exposure of what’s been breaking for a weeks now on the Bush conspiracy and genocide program. Like Saddam, do Bush, Cheney and all of them deserve any less than the same rope? Saddam’s head was ripped off. No shortage of volunteers to do theirs.




If all goes well, the announcement of a start date to the Bush Administration trial could be just six [now 3] weeks away


Quiet Mike
25 July 2014

Last summer, Inder Comar, Esq. filed a lawsuit against the Bush Administration on behalf of Iraqi refugee plaintiff Sundus Shaker Saleh. It is a noble attempt to hold the Bush Administration accountable for war crimes and a case that Quiet Mike has been following from the beginning.

Earlier this year, the Department of Justice, who is defending the six Bush Administration officials, responded to the lawsuit by requesting that the case be dismissed. The Bush tribe is claiming that the planning of the war occurred within the scope of their employment and therefore they have immunity.

Rather than dismissing the case, the Judge asked for additional information. So Mr. Comar filed a 2nd amended complaint back in June. The amended complaint provides more details about the planning of the Iraq war and when it started.

Comar’s evidence, shows the Bush/Cheney team started planning the invasion of Iraq as far back as 1997. The amended complaint also explains that the war was motivated by personal enrichment and the war was a “crime of aggression.”

Earlier this week. Inder Comar got his chance in court to respond to the motion to dismiss and explain the 2nd amended complaint further. He essentially made two points to the court.

The first argument he made was something called judicial estoppel. It prevents a party from taking a position in a case which is contrary to a position they have taken in earlier legal proceedings. In this case, Comar used the Nuremburg Trials as an example.

The Nuremburg Trials, which the United States views as legitimate, held Nazi leaders accountable for their acts of aggression. Comar held that judicial estoppel dictates the Bush Administration and DOJ can’t argue that leaders aren’t accountable for acts of aggression because it runs contrary to the US’s position at Nuremburg.

The second point that was made referred to the Augusto Pinochet trial. In 1999, British Lawyers determined that Pinochet did not have immunity for certain acts he committed while in office such as torture and other violations of international law. These Brits held that Pinochet was not immune because Chile had signed the convention against torture.

In light of the treaties and charters that the United States has signed, Comar stated that the defence can’t now claim that acts of aggression are above a leader’s authority. In this case, the Bush Administration.

What does all this mean? On August 15th, the United States will have the opportunity to respond to the second amended complaint. In the meantime, a hearing is scheduled for September 11th, of all dates. If the hearing goes ahead as scheduled, and if all else goes well, the announcement of a start date in the trial to hold the Bush Administration accountable could be just six weeks away.

If you are hearing about this case for the first time, you can follow its progress on Witness Iraq. You can also read up with our past articles. Please spread the word, too few people are even aware of Mr. Comar’s efforts. This case deserves all our support.



link

7 comments :

  1. So, while they were in official duty they made the decision to go to war in Iraq; which they are using as an excuse for prosecutorial immunity? What, do they have amnesia...we remember 911, we remember that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, we remember they killed Sadam Hussein,, and we remember that the pretext to war was a bogus excuse to stop investigations, steal gold, and cause the stock market to crash all so that they could mysteriously inject illegal trades into the system...money came due...what??? For money thousands and maybe millions around the nation and beyond were affected one way or the other...not to forget the horror foisted upon an unsuspecting public who believed that we were under attack...they got 99 problems and a b__tch ain't one...(LOL)

    What the grand jury should do is ask the citizens what we think...(and I don't mean through their bogus polls).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh boy...

    This was retweeted from Cliff High: insane secret twerker Dick(head) Cheney planning yet another attack against USA.

    http://foxnewsinsider.com/2014/08/20/cheney-%E2%80%98absolutely-certain-there-will-be-another-mass-casualty-attack-against-us%E2%80%99 …

    https://twitter.com/clif_high/status/502483513661464580

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All they do is try to keep us in fear to take our eyes off of the real issues. Perfect love hath no fear!!! It worked before, they have to come up with new strategies now.

      I do not put anything past these crumb snatchers. They can't be human???

      Delete
    2. Fedup

      I agree...what's coming is anyone's guess.

      Delete
    3. What's coming is their demise...this lawlessness cannot persist this is our world and they are only visiting. Corruption have no place here. Our Creator assigned this planet to us to beautify it, to learn from it, and to learn about "The One" and the Universe...like discovering ourselves.

      The truth is pure, it enlightens, and it is freedom...this is where we are headed...I don't know what they're going to do, but they can't do what they think they want to do...this is for sure!

      Thank you CalGirl

      Delete
  3. Reader: Bush no longer has immunity, no public official has immunity any longer

    Posted By: CGI_admin [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 21-Aug-2014 16:24:34

    In Response To: CGI's jopipe: Bush Administration Lawsuit Hearing Scheduled for Sept. 11th (CGI_admin)

    ***********************************

    Re: CGI's jopipe: Bush Administration Lawsuit ....

    Bush no longer has immunity, no public official has immunity any longer. The Pope has issued a decree in 2013 (Motu Proprio) declaring all public officials globally no longer immune from public prosecution.

    Check it out :

    http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/motu_proprio/documents/hf_ben-xvi_motu-proprio_20121111_caritas_en.html

    Perhaps you should share this with those suing Bush ??
    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=315093

    ReplyDelete

If your comment violates OWON's Terms of Service or has in the past, then it will NOT be published.

Powered by Blogger.